Central banks AI integration remains slow and cautious across global financial institutions, reflecting a deep-rooted concern about stability and crisis risk in the monetary system. A new survey from the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF) highlights how central banks managing a combined $6.5 trillion in assets from Europe, Africa, Latin America, and Asia are approaching AI with restraint rather than enthusiasm.
The report shows that more than 60 percent of these institutions avoid using AI for core functions, signaling a widespread fear that automating essential tasks could “accelerate future crises” rather than prevent them. Interestingly, the banks experimenting most actively with AI are also the most cautious, emphasizing firm boundaries around human oversight and decision authority.
Current experimentation with Central banks AI tools is limited to low-risk, repetitive tasks. These include summarizing datasets, scanning market updates, and assembling reports that previously required significant manual effort. While these applications offer efficiency gains, central banks remain unwilling to extend AI into sensitive domains such as risk modeling, liquidity forecasting, or portfolio construction.
That hesitation is partly fueled by broader industry concerns. AI-driven automation has already contributed to job reductions across technology and commercial banking, raising questions about reliability in mission-critical monetary policies that affect entire economies.
One survey participant summarized the prevailing mindset: “AI helps us see more, but decisions must remain with people.” This attitude reinforces the belief that central banks view AI as a supplementary tool rather than a transformative engine for decision-making.
Interest in digital assets is even more muted. According to the survey, 93 percent of institutions have no plans to invest in cryptocurrencies or other distributed-ledger-based assets. Tokenization receives some curiosity, but not enough to influence reserve strategies.
Many central banks remain wary of untested assets with uncertain legal frameworks and volatile market behavior. Skepticism remains strong even as global financial narratives shift toward a multipolar environment. With six G20 and two G7 central banks participating in the survey, the findings reflect a broad mistrust of crypto as a meaningful reserve instrument.
The survey also captures a notable contradiction in global currency preferences. Nearly 60 percent of respondents express a desire to diversify away from the U.S. dollar. Their concerns include potential trade tensions under President Trump’s reinstated tariff agenda and growing doubts about the Federal Reserve’s institutional independence.
Despite this stated desire to diversify, central banks admit they remain locked into the dollar due to the unmatched liquidity of U.S. Treasury markets. No alternative currency including the euro or China’s yuan offers the scale, depth, or stability needed to replace the dollar’s global reserve status.
As one central banker noted, “We’re moving from bipolar to multipolar reserves, but the euro isn’t ready to lead.” The result is a stalled de-dollarization effort that underscores the practical constraints of reserve management.
As these tensions unfold, the future of Central banks AI adoption hinges on a delicate balance between innovation and caution. AI holds real promise for improving forecasting accuracy, accelerating fraud detection, and enhancing supervisory capabilities.
At the same time, risks tied to algorithmic opacity, biased outputs, and unpredictable model behavior remain serious deterrents for institutions responsible for economic stability. This creates a measured approach: explore, test, and evaluate, but avoid major operational dependence until oversight frameworks mature.
Emerging markets illustrate both the potential and limits of Central banks AI integration. AI-driven surveillance tools could help these regions track real-time capital flows, strengthen anti-money-laundering networks, and monitor risks that previously moved too fast for manual analysis.
Yet the digital infrastructure gaps between advanced and developing economies mean only a fraction can pursue sophisticated AI pilots. The European Central Bank and a few Asian institutions are experimenting with more advanced prototypes, though scalability remains a long-term challenge. OMFIF stresses the need for ethical guidelines and regulatory standards to ensure any future deployment is responsible and does not introduce systemic vulnerabilities.
The dollar’s entrenched dominance continues to shape global financial behavior. Even with pressures from geopolitical rifts, BRICS currency initiatives, and shifting trade alliances, practical realities keep central banks tethered to the U.S. currency. Liquidity demands, safe-haven value, and settlement infrastructure reinforce the dollar’s role.
Survey results suggest that political uncertainty may accelerate the desire for diversification, yet actual moves remain gradual and cautious. Central banks appear committed to evolution rather than abrupt change, preferring to adjust in small steps rather than take outsized risks.
Central banks AI hesitation reflects a pivotal moment in global finance. Technology offers powerful new tools, yet trust in those tools has not caught up. For institutions charged with maintaining economic stability, the priority is deliberate progress over aggressive transformation.
Expect pilot programs, controlled experiments, and slow expansion rather than broad adoption. The coming years will test how quickly confidence can grow and whether AI can prove reliable enough to earn a stronger role in the world’s most sensitive financial systems.
Stay ahead of how AI reshapes global finance, head to ainewstoday.org for your essential AI policy and innovation updates!
